Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Rajput

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Rajput

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I failed to find significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources to support notability. The speedy was declined but the subject fails to pass WP:GNG. GSS (talk) 16:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 16:49, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hair stylists are not inherently notable; I can't find anything reliable to back the claims made and it seems to be a clear WP:GNG failure Spiderone 22:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Trivial coverage in few gossip columns. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 04:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's in fact no actual significance given the only thinly listed claims are for working with other people, hence advertising alone. SwisterTwister talk 01:23, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteFails WP:GNG.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.