Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh Narain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh Narain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NPROF. ∯WBG^converse 12:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 13:27, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I see a number of rather detailed discussions of here works on google.books (enough for WP:PROF). Could someone estimate if the sources / authors are academic themselves? I see only one from Springer. --FIFAukr (talk) 15:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Based on the above user's edits to the actual article, the above comment seems to refer to this article which discusses Narain's works. — MarkH21 (talk) 02:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. Low citations on Google scholar aren't enough for WP:PROF. I only found two published reviews of one of his books [1] [2], not enough to convince me of WP:AUTHOR, but if more turn up I could change my mind. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.