Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasan Hamid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hasan Hamid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, fails WP:GNG. References do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Previously declined/deleted. Draft:Hasan Hamid DMySon (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I can read Bengali and i can say this, there is zero WP:SIGCOV about this person. The article (& Draft:Hasan Hamid) is full of WP:REFBOMB. Every single refs are written by the subject himself, which proves the person is a (professional) columnist but this doesn't mean they are automatically notable for wikipedia. Zero significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Didn't won any significant award or anything. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Whiteguru (talk) 19:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Possible WP:PAID or WP:COI article as well. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - An article should speak for itself, and this stub does not contain enough information to establish general notability or author notability. There is also a draft, Draft:Hasan Hamid, which has been declined five times, primarily for tone reasons, and which has been reference-bombed with 140 references. The draft can be left in draft space after this stub is deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.