Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasan Mohsin
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hasan Mohsin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not played single First class game GreenCricketTALK 10:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. High level of performances at the under 19 world cup lead to him passing the GNG. The-Pope (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Some coverage, but I believe not enough to pass WP:GNG. Also fails WP:NCRIC. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not an expert at Cricket-related issues, but as I read WP:NCRICKET, he falls short.
- Delete He does not appear to meet NCRICKET. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.