Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hashim Lafond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G5) by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:16, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hashim Lafond

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently minor actor, with his supposedly best-known-for roles including "Carnival Patron" and "Student". Only secondary sources given are him being captioned-in-passing in a local paper as a woman's son-in-law, and being quoted about painting a mural with other teenagers in 2005. Fails WP:BASIC. McGeddon (talk) 12:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:BASIC and does not meet WP:NACTOR. The roles in notable films have not been significant, and general coverage is non-existent. No longer a penguin (talk) 13:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. imdb shows a series of small, mostly uncredited parts. imdb biography (not reliable) used as principal reference. Other references mention subject but are not really about him. ubiquity (talk) 14:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete as per nom. Doesn't meet WP:GNG and my searches really didn't find much. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article can be recreated when there are more notable coverages. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as comprehensively failing WP:NBIO. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing better at all for any solid notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close as article has been G5 speedy deleted?Coolabahapple (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article's creator was blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Mdhashim24. --McGeddon (talk) 16:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.