Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatch (startup)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude (talk) 08:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hatch (startup)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company appears to be defunct, but its demise was not notable enough to get press coverage. The sourcing is largely PR about funding and corporate renames, rather than being about their product. The funding wasn't significant enough to suggest notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Was a good ride, now let's switch off the light. Natural conclusion for a COI spam article based solely on hype. Rentier (talk) 07:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.