Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy Mojo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy Mojo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still a non-notable hip hop group; article was kept simply because nobody else turned up for AfD round 1. There is one link to a blog, otherwise is unsourced. A search for sources just brings back an Allmusic page and lots of self-published or insignificant things. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• leaning delete the Allmusic is just a listing, not even a bio. No US chart history. GNews gives me only passing mentions in show lineups. If there's anything that passes WP:NMUSIC, this is the time to add it - David Gerard (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Subject's coverage in RS is only of passing mention, thus lacking significant notabiity. Meatsgains (talk) 14:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.