Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helmet Integrated Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:40, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helmet Integrated Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company which does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG Speedy was contested because of promotional "World's Leading" term. Searches have brought up nothing of value to demonstrate notability. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as searches found nothing noticeably better for an improvable article. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unable to find anything as SwisterTwister stated. On a related note, the speedy decline seems rather odd because A7 requires a credible claim of significance, and a marketing claim about being "world's leading" in the field is hardly a credible claim as that's a commonly used promotional term. Elaenia (talk) 07:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.