Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here's to You (radio program)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here's to You (radio program)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources and no SIGCOV located. Notable at all? InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 04:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Canada. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 04:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All I was able to find were (likely bot-created) articles that reprinted the text of the WP article. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although as a nationally-networked radio program this would be eligible to keep an article that was properly sourced, existence isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to pass WP:GNG on its sourceability. But even on a ProQuest search for older sourcing that might not have Googled, I just found glancing namechecks of its existence, and absolutely nothing that would constitute GNG-building coverage or analysis of it at all. It can stay, unlinked, in the historical programming section of CBC Music, but it doesn't need its own standalone article if we can't support one with proper referencing. Bearcat (talk) 17:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.