Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hexamail Guard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hexamail Guard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Unable to find any reliable sources to indicate otherwise. Elaenia (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not seem notable. Insert CleverPhrase Here 06:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for multiple issues since 2012. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.