Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the hawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 13:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History of the hawk

History of the hawk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe they meet WP:BAND - not notable imo Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 11:07, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I don't see any obvious signs of notability. Punk bands can be difficult to source, though. Most of them are not exactly itching to sell out, get famous, and do interviews in glossy magazines. Punknews.org is sometimes a reliable source, but this is a trivial mention. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of the hawk, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.