Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ho Hum Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Hum Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, another non-notable record label that only receives very minor passing mentions and name checks. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I took a look and wasn't able to find any coverage that would help the label satisfy WP:NCORP. Teemu08 (talk) 01:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hohum. No refs in the article, google not offering anything. Szzuk (talk) 19:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.