Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hopesfall/old

"They're hardly known throughout the scene" - so utter unknowns then. Delete - self promotion. Secretlondon 00:54, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the article itself says they're non-notable. -- Cyrius|&#9998 03:07, May 3, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete -- Chris 73 | Talk 03:29, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable, possible vanity. Alcarillo 16:06, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, if possible. - Lucky 6.9 18:38, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
• No, no, keep! I don't know what the author was trying to say with that "hardly known" comment, but hopesfall are certainly not unknowns. I'm not a fan, but I've heard of them, and in fact I've seen them live. Do a google search for "hopesfall" and you'll get 28,000+ hits, and every single one I looked at was a reference to the band. There are lyrics pages and reviews of their albums all over the web. Isomorphic 19:24, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Holy...! With that "hardly known" comment, who would have even considered a Google search? Way to go, Isomorphic! I withdraw my delete vote and move that the page be expanded. I do believe that I'm going to start doing more Google searches when it comes to bands. - Lucky 6.9 00:09, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • D'oh. Keep -- Cyrius|&#9998 00:21, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
  • Should have googled it ... keep -- Chris 73 | Talk 23:21, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable enough for inclusion. Adequate stub. Maybe cleanup, but I think it will grow as is. Andrewa 15:01, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Cribcage 03:09, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Jesus, people don't even do a google search before voting delete? anthony (see warning)