Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How Students Learn
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. If people want to pursue a merge, that can be discussed on the talk pages. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:30, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How Students Learn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Could possibly redirect, as one of its two editors is notable, but that could be misleading as article contains nothing on the book and he is only one of the editors. Boleyn (talk) 08:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Criteria says:
Here are reviews and other sources:- Adomanis, James F. (May 2006). "How Students Learn: History in the Classroom, edited by M. Suzanne Donovan and John D. Bransford. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005. 615 pages. $34.95, paper, with a CD-ROM". The History Teacher. 39 (3). Society for History Education: 410–411. doi:10.2307/30036810. ISSN 0018-2745.
- Gilbert, John K. (2005-09-26). "How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom". Science Education. 89 (6). Wiley: 1043–1045. doi:10.1002/sce.20115. ISSN 0036-8326.
- Coffey, David (March 2006). "How Students Learn: Mathematics in the Classroom". Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 11 (7). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 351–352. ISSN 1072-0839. JSTOR 41182323.
- Leach, John T. (2005-12-16). "Book review: How students learn: Science in the classroom". International Journal of Science Education. 27 (15). Routledge: 1883–1886. doi:10.1080/09500690500247576. ISSN 0950-0693.
- Carboni, Lisa Wilson (March 2006). "How Students Learn: Mathematics in the Classroom". Teaching Children Mathematics. 12 (7). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 384. ISSN 1073-5836. JSTOR 41198776.
- Godsell, Sarah (2016-12-03). "What is history? Views from a primary school teacher education programme". South African Journal of Childhood Education. 6 (1). University of Johannesburg. doi:10.4102/sajce.v6i1.485. ISSN 2223-7682. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-03-30.
- Davis, Seonaid (September 2005). "Teaching Science Through the Use of Modelling [How Students Learn History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom]". The Crucible. 371 (1). Science Teachers' Association of Ontario: 16–18. ISSN 0381-8047.
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow How Students Learn to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".Sources with quotes- Adomanis, James F. (May 2006). "How Students Learn: History in the Classroom, edited by M. Suzanne Donovan and John D. Bransford. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005. 615 pages. $34.95, paper, with a CD-ROM". The History Teacher. 39 (3). Society for History Education: 410–411. doi:10.2307/30036810. ISSN 0018-2745.
The review notes:
- Gilbert, John K. (2005-09-26). "How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom". Science Education. 89 (6). Wiley: 1043–1045. doi:10.1002/sce.20115. ISSN 0036-8326.
The review notes:
- Coffey, David (March 2006). "How Students Learn: Mathematics in the Classroom". Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 11 (7). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 351–352. ISSN 1072-0839. JSTOR 41182323.
The review notes:
- Leach, John T. (2005-12-16). "Book review: How students learn: Science in the classroom". International Journal of Science Education. 27 (15). Routledge: 1883–1886. doi:10.1080/09500690500247576. ISSN 0950-0693.
The review notes:
- Carboni, Lisa Wilson (March 2006). "How Students Learn: Mathematics in the Classroom". Teaching Children Mathematics. 12 (7). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 384. ISSN 1073-5836. JSTOR 41198776.
The review notes:
- Godsell, Sarah (2016-12-03). "What is history? Views from a primary school teacher education programme". South African Journal of Childhood Education. 6 (1). University of Johannesburg. doi:10.4102/sajce.v6i1.485. ISSN 2223-7682. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-03-30.
The review notes:
- Davis, Seonaid (September 2005). "Teaching Science Through the Use of Modelling [How Students Learn History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom]". The Crucible. 371 (1). Science Teachers' Association of Ontario: 16–18. ISSN 0381-8047.
Cunard (talk) 08:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:NBOOK, as having been reviewed by multiple independent sources. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Query: is this a single book or three separate books? Reviews #1–5 listed by Cunard above refer to three distinct books, How Students Learn: History in the Classroom, How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom and How Students Learn: Mathematics in the Classroom, though #6 cites a single work entitled How Students Learn History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom and #7 appears to do the same, though I can't access it. WorldCat lists all four. Can anyone shed any light on this? If, as seems likely, these are three books that were also published simultaneously as an omnibus edition, is this a common format in this field and, if so, how do we deal with such works? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom (2001) is the 1st title published and covers all the subjects, the other three titles - How students learn: History in the Classroom (2005), How students learn: Mathematics in the Classroom (2005), and How students learn: Science in the Classroom (2005), are more specific (as the titles imply). a "Publication history" section could be added to cover these, also a "Reception" section could differentiate the various reviews for each title. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Having looked into it a bit more, it seems that you're right (though the 2001 date is incorrect – per the sources and WorldCat, How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom was published in 2005 and the others in the same year). As such, only two of the source identified by Cunard (#6 and #7) are directly relevant, the other sources being about closely-related but nonetheless different books. Source #6 contains significant discussion of this book, but we require multiple sources, so whether or not the book is notable would seem to depend on what source #7 has to say about it. Unfortunately I haven't been able to access that source or find out anything about it. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- yes, agree about it being published in 2005, i based the 2001 year on the worldCat entries here but it looks like that it may have been the year of the individual contributions within the book, anyway i still reckon this is wikinotable, maybe the article could be reworked ie. "How Students Learn is a series of books ....." with reception section reflecting this etc etc. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- I agree that "How Students Learn is a series of books ....." is the best way to present the material about these books. Cunard (talk) 08:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Merge to How People Learn. Even if this is an independently notable book or series of books, it is still clearly a spinoff of the other, and combining the information from both currently short and stubby articles will create a single more informative article. BD2412 T 20:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.