Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugging Face

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ignoring the comments by accounts blocked for sockpuppetry, there is clear consensus to keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hugging Face (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not reliable article, not enough independent sources for WP:COMP Bigneeerman (talk) 13:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of sources I've found. To be completed.

• https://www.bfmtv.com/tech/nouveautes-produits/hugging-face-l-ia-qui-veut-devenir-la-meilleure-amie-des-ados_AN-201703180013.html report on BFM TV from March 2017, in French
• https://www.lesechos.fr/start-up/deals/hugging-face-la-nouvelle-licorne-americaine-creee-par-deux-francais-1405786 in Les Echos (France), from May 2022

PAC2 (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• https://techcrunch.com/2021/03/11/hugging-face-raises-40-million-for-its-natural-language-processing-library/, TechCrunch, March 2021,PAC2 (talk) 19:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrickcai/2022/05/09/the-2-billion-emoji-hugging-face-wants-to-be-launchpad-for-a-machine-learning-revolution/, Forbes PAC2 (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• https://techcrunch.com/2017/03/09/hugging-face-wants-to-become-your-artificial-bff/, TechCrunch from 2017,PAC2 (talk) 19:10, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• https://techcrunch.com/2022/05/24/hugging-face-collaborates-with-microsoft-for-new-ai-powered-azure-service/, TechCrunch from May 2022 PAC2 (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• https://www.businessinsider.com/hugging-face-funding-round-valuation-lux-addition-2022-4?op=1&r=US&IR=T from Business Insider, 2022,PAC2 (talk) 19:14, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom, indeed does not appear to be notable. --不和の林檎 (talk) 07:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Huggingface has received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. See the list of sources above. I think it satisfies WP:ORGCRITE. PAC2 (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I agree with PAC2, Huggingface has received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. See the list of sources above. I think it satisfies WP:ORGCRITE. Minimax Regret (talk) 17:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:SERIESA. The financial history of the company is irrelevant. FalconK (talk) 22:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  A $2 billion valuation is pretty relevant. Dandv 05:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Where in our guidelines/policies does it say that valuations are considered for notability? (Hint: It doesn't). HighKing⁺⁺ 14:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep Deleting the article now only means it will be recreated later, when Hugging Face will (doubtlessly for anyone in NLP) receive more WP:RS coverage. Reliable sources lag behind community traction for any open source project. -- Dandv 05:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.