Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanitainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that there are insufficient/no sources that are both reliable, independent and meet SIGCOV. Therefore, notability is not met. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Humanitainment

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Of the three sources for this article one mentions a video they released, but not the organisation itself. That leaves YouTube and Gawker as sources. Lack of sustained coverage from reliable independent sources, so not notable. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No WP:SIGCOV found in reliable, independent sources in my WP:BEFORE. I found the same attempts to define the term that the nom appears to have found but nothing actually supporting notability of the company under WP:GNG let alone under WP:CORP. As such this fails for not being sufficiently notable. FOARP (talk) 15:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.