Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huntsman Security

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Huntsman Security

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Pakistani cybersecurity company. The sources provided (at least those not behind a $2000 paywall) are completely lacking in WP:CORPDEPTH, providing only brief mentions. I came across this while hunting down linkspam for tier3.pk, which is linked in this article and I cannot verify that the domain is related to the subject. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Huntsman Security is nothing to do with pakistan or tier3.pk - It is an australian cyber security software company and was covered as recently in Forrester Research Security Analytics Wave (2017) and the Vendor Landscape (2016) - these are gated content (paywalled on Forrester, but available for free from several vendors sites) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Only1weasel (talk • contribs) 10:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:37, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The bulk of the article talks about the general line of business, not the company. In particular their claim to have invented Behavioural Anomaly detection seems not to be supported by the literature DGG ( talk ) 13:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Tagged since 2013, no indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺18:29, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and NCORP. Antonioatrylia (talk) 07:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to passing WP:NCORP standards. Dysklyver 15:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.