Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hy-Gain Antennas and Rotators

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to MFJ Enterprises. History remains should there be sourced info to merge Star Mississippi 12:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hy-Gain Antennas and Rotators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub about a company that manufactures antennas for ham radio. The only two sources cited are PR from the company itself and a WP:BEFORE search reveals only promotional information rather than any WP:SIGCOV. This company is likely notable within the ham radio hobbyist sphere, but I'm not seeing any justification for a Wikipedia article. Flip Format (talk) 09:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Companies, Engineering, and United States of America. Flip Format (talk) 09:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mississippi and Nebraska. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep' - it is notable in its little world. Unfortunately I'm traveling and not in a position to go digging for refs in the obscure but reliable refs.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 12:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm striking my "keep" for now, pending refs. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 12:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amateur radio --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 12:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or redirect to MFJ Enterprises, of which it is a subsidiary. A quick search shows some coverage, [1], [2], and maybe, not sure about reliability: [3]. Basic facts about the company and its products are verifiable, as well as some of it's history. I don't know if this is enough coverage for GNG, but it is enough verifiability to merge verifiable bits to MFJ, which places the former company in a modern context. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 21:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or redirect to the parent, MFJ Enterprises.Jacona (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to its parent company MFJ Enterprises. Fails WP:GNG per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 03:11, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.