Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyder Nawab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hyder Nawab

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has no notability except for being part of the House of Paigah. Sources used are a website that is dedicated to royals and a random YouTube video. Spodle^Talk 11:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spodle^Talk 11:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Telangana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No claim to notability (WP:NOTINHERITED). As for the sources, the royal geneaology website doesn't even mention his name. Finding sources is not straightforward because there's several possible stylings of the name (Nawab being a title that's sometimes considered part of a name), but since the article doesn't actually claim that the person is independently notable, it looks like this article goes against WP:NOTGENEALOGY. --bonadea contributions talk 15:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.