Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrogen link network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrogen link network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unless anyone plans to broaden the scope to include all H2 infrastructure in the country e.g. https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/energy-transition/102723-netherlands-begins-construction-of-national-hydrogen-pipeline-network pipelines it does not seem to be notable enough to have an article in English Chidgk1 (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Denmark. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not appear to be independently notable, and not sure where to merge. SportingFlyer T·C 16:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.