Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperwallet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperwallet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Every reference is either their own site or a press release, mostly payments.com, -- which , while it may contain some genuine editorial material, seems devoted mainly to providing a place for companies in the field to advertise their products. DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, this is straight-up spam - I did a reference check, and the sourcing is largely to sponsored content sites. (hint: if there's a header for "white papers", it's a sponsored opinion analyst site, not an RS engaging any sort of editorial critical faculties.) - David Gerard (talk) 10:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON; the company is not yet notable. I'm seeing PR or PR-like mentions, or trivial coverage, such as in Google books. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.