Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypnautic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Let me know when Top Flite Empire gets created and I will restore the history and redirect. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hypnautic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposing deletion for lack of notability. While the article has lots of references the independent coverage of Hypnautic is trivial at best. Several references fail to mention him at all. Searches turn up very little additional, mainly interviews which don't help. Fails WP:N,WP:BIO and WP: BAND. If the subject was Top Flite Empire (music group) it might be salvageable. Gab4gab (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move and Redirect to Top Flite Empire - There isn't an incredible amount out there about this one person, but I think that significant coverage exists in sources about the group. Specifically, I believe that this article, this interview, along with independent coverage of their music such as this, and coverage of their views such as this are examples of sources that demonstrate that the group passes WP:GNG and merits their collective inclusion in Wikipedia. Winner 42 Talk to me! 02:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All WP:TOOSOON. Crucially, I cannot find any reference to the Billboard chart which would highlight the notability. If that can be found and referenced I would be minded to change my position to a weak keep. Karst (talk) 12:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.