Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Dreaming of a TV Christmas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 19:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Dreaming of a TV Christmas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable clip-compilation one-off TV special. It got a few brief comments in newspapers at the time, but no in-depth reviews, and there isn't really anything to add. No lasting significance. Moswento ^talky 12:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clip show of other shows; non-notable and judging from the Saville connection, won't see air again outside of the tape traders. Nate • (chatter) 18:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just a thought. Would the Saville connection provide any notability? I know notability isn't inherited (especially in that case!!) but I figured I'd throw it into the pot anyway for consideration. Dragonfire X (talk) 11:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 04:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One-off show, nothing which hints at notability (a link to IMDB doesn't count). I mean, yeah, it's got the two Ronnies, which has to count for something, but that's not enough to pass WP:GNG. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.