Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IAT Automotive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IAT Automotive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The assertion that this company is a "Beijing-based vehicle design and engineering company that has been active for the past 35 years" without any attribution immediately raises concerns. As far as I can see, IAT Automotive may fail any number of tests for notability including but not limited to WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. As always, please do prove me wrong. Pete in Australia aka User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Engineering, Transportation, and China. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can find the company mentioned in lists of parts suppliers, and a few very brief mentions in automotive magazines. The only extended coverage is what is provided here about a fire in their booth during an exhibit. I will check back to see if anyone turns up better sources.
• Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.