Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICPL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:A11 Shirt58 (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ICPL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible hoax? I'm really not sure. Minimally it has to be some un-notable story. Ethically ^(Yours) 16:37, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another in a series. I guess I'll just copy and paste my previous rationale: May be a hoax. I see no evidence that it even exists Even if it does, it's not notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and per talk page comments by author that reveal that he only writes these for his friends to read them. --S.G.^(GH) _ping! 16:15, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. I've tagged it for a speedy. On a side note, I've extended the block for the original author to indefinite. His only edits have been to either spam for his books or to vandalize another page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.