Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDS NEXT Software (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IDS NEXT Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability or passing WP:ORG. Sources (if any) are mostly press releases not independent sources. Last AFD closed with no contributors. Ajf773 (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 04:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:CORPSPAM, etc. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article does no more than describe a company going about its business (developing its software, providing client training):run of the mill activity rather than indicating encyclopaedic notability. Nor do the given sources or those found by search, including the tailored Indian news source search, indicate better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Any article that says they provide solutions while the subject has nothing at all to do with solvents was written by marketing. Even if the company were notable from being around so long, it would need to have an article in English. W Nowicki (talk) 23:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.