Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEC College of Engineering and Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IEC College of Engineering and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete:Does not satisfy WP:schooloutcomes or WP:nschool or wp:org. Apart from the primary sources there dont seem to be any other secondary sources to satisfy Notability. Vikram Vincent 13:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC) * Propose a merge with the university page, since that is notable. Vikram Vincent 10:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this article lacks the level of sourcing we need to show that an organization is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Accredited degree-awarding tertiary institution, so most certainly satisfies WP:Schooloutcomes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Non-notable awards where the reference to the awards is a dead link. Vikram Vincent 14:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article and its website certainly say it awards degrees. Are you maintaining it doesn't? -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'm making two claims: 1. The institute is affiliated to Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University and could be merged into that article as a list item, and 2. The 'awards and recognition' section contents cannot be verified(the awards being non-notable too). Also see: The typical outcomes from previous discussions about average articles on this subject are not binding on this one and may not be relevant to this particular article. Please consider adding your opinion about whether this specific subject meets any relevant notability guideline.

Vikram Vincent 13:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be suggesting that consensus is irrelevant! Not sure where you got that one from. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Necrothesp. There is even a tag called {{outcomes}} to express that point. Vikram Vincent 13:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus is the whole basis of how we do things on Wikipedia. It is never irrelevant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment User:Vincentvikram is randomly nominating articles without any solid statement. I noticed, he provided almost same reason (Notability and non Reliable Sources) for all articles nominated for deletion. It seems like his edits are not constructive on Wikipedia. DMySon 17:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Sources in the article do not have SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE showed nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, more database and directory style listings. The keep vote above does not list any sources to check, and the reasons listed are opinions not supported by guidelines. Fails GNG and ORGCRIT. If anyone can find sources with SIGCOV, post them and I'll be happy to check them and change my !vote if this can be shown to meet guidelines. I oppose a merge because nothing is properly sourced.  // Timothy :: talk  08:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source evaluation table:

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment unless someone can come with WP:THREE sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOLS the article needs to be deleted. The last few pages I nominated for AFD are being deleted so the "consensus" is moving to delete non-notable tertiary institutes. Vikram Vincent 07:07, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.