Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFIP Working Group 2.10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:39, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IFIP Working Group 2.10 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT Clenpr (talk) 07:03, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Engineering, and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:NSOFT Iban14mxl (talk) 20:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any non-template opinions?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-entirely promotional article, fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is not a notable subject, and a badly written article. We don't have to make a page for every random committee in every random international org with minimal to no authority.AnonymousScholar49 (talk)AnonymousScholar49

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.