Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IKON activity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IKON activity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is already a page for this group here-> IKON (South Korean band). This seems to be a fans attempt to take things that were not allowed on the groups main page and create a separate page where they could have those things. Some of the problems with this page is poor sourcing, lots of unimportant information like a chart of every music music show appearance for the group, and repeating information from the main page just this time in chart form. Peachywink (talk) 20:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Peachywink (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Peachywink (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Peachywink (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - perfect example of WP:FANCRUFT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to iKON (South Korean band). Per WP:LISTN, I don't think that this list serves any recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes. The important information can be included in the main article. --Cerebellum (talk) 00:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.