Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISeleb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ISeleb

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification. Useless references. As written fails WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indonesia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i just to revised and repair the article of Indonesian programs Tomboyprida (talk) 15:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be accurate, @Tomboyprida, you made an unwise unilateral move to mainspace of an article that required work as a draft. That move triggered this deletion discussion 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tomboyprida has been blocked as a sock of the blocked article creator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pending possible analysis of sources. This article, which is the product of a now-blocked editor and their sockpuppet, does not speak for itself and so does not establish corporate notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.