Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IWF Promotions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. As usual, we can not agee on whethe existing souces are good enough. Defaulted to keep.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IWF Promotions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for non notable professional wrestling promotion. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Just a small local promotion HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:CORP. Nikki♥311 21:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Two news articles (citations 3 and 4) are from Westword and The Greeley Tribune respectively. Do they not qualify as "independent reliable sources"? I easily found two more articles [1] [2] in a basic search. 72.74.200.86 (talk) 05:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 04:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep IP's findings are good enough for me, although the one from craigdailypress has little to do with the promotion.LM2000 (talk) 06:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.