Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibtehal Abu Saad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ibtehal Abu Saad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E Cabayi (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 10:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Engineering, and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Microsoft#2020–present: Acquisitions, Xbox Series X/S, and Windows 11, last sentence about the 50th anniversary. I doubt that event is notable since it seems like ye regular burst of NotNews coverage. Aaron Liu (talk) 12:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename -- this is an oversimplification of BLP1E. BLP1E requires three things for deletion -- first, the subject is known for only one thing, second, they are low-profile, third, the event is not significant or their role was not substantial. Her role was very clearly substantial. We can debate whether the event is significant, but given it got so much news coverage, I would say it is worth keeping. This article should be moved to a title like "Microsoft 50th anniversary disruptions", not deleted, to comply with BLP1E. Mrfoogles (talk) 21:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The event isn't that significant either per WP:ContinuedCoverage. Aaron Liu (talk) 23:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:29, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Clear-cut BLP1E.
  • Reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event. All sources in the article are about the subject's protest.
  • The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. The subject has not done any interviews or media appearances after the protest.
  • The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. The protest lasted less than a minute and did not lead to any changes in Microsoft policy. It is not even worth mentioning in a "History of Microsoft" article. An article about the protest would fail WP:NEVENT.

Astaire (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.