Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IcuTest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IcuTest

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have no doubt this would be a G12 with phrasing like IcuTest believes that the most effective place to test is within the unit test if the software were contemporary and we could find the souce since this is copypasta. However it's copypasta that survived both speedy and PROD over the last decace, so we're here. What we don't have is any in depth sourcing about IcuTest or what it does. There are a lot of false positives due to ICU tests, but adding GUI filters it some. There are some fora and a stack exchange post, but nothing in depth or significant. Star Mississippi 02:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I PRODed it 12 years ago and it has lived up to the lack of notability from then. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My search did not find any significant coverage either: only the same sort of inadequate sources that the nominator found. Unless there's something I'm missing, IcuTest does not pass the GNG or any other relevant notability guideline. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Gusfriend (talk) 06:37, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.