Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Identity 2.0 (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Identity 2.0
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Identity 2.0 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An "ill-defined" buzzword. Article is full of 2007 hype. Newer uses seem largely unrelated to the current content. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with power that the term seems ill-defined, although this blog post cleared it up a bit for me. I did some searching and was unable to find that many people (i.e. SIGCOV) talking about this term itself (as opposed to just using it), which by NEO means we shouldn't have an article on this term yet. Enterprisey (talk!) 03:08, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NEO due to low usage per Google Trends. The article describes OpenID and CardSpace as two technologies in the "Identity 2.0" category that are "on the rise" and expected to hit mainstream adoption between 2009-2012 (2007 plus 2-5 years). This Google Trends comparison, which has a time range from when this article was created to today, shows that the term "Identity 2.0" was never significantly used even when OpenID and CardSpace were at their peaks. — Newslinger talk 13:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.