Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idrees Ul Haq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Idrees Ul Haq

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional piece. Claim to notability is a bunch of non-notable awards; most of the references are either broken, mention the subject in passing, or were written by the subject. Prod was previously disputed by article creator User:Jkinnovators an WP:SPA with obvious ties to the subject. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:36, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:07, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per A7. Also Social Royal Voluntary Environmental Service. I strongly suspect the article is an autobiography. — kashmīrī ^TALK 10:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with speedy delete - it's an obvious promotional article that doesn't meet notability. Ravensfire (talk) 16:29, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep None of the sources I have reviewed (as exhibited below) are either broken or written by the subject. They discuss the subject mostly significantly and not in passing. These are English sources; there may be many more local language Urdu and Kashmiri sources available.^{[1][2][3][4][5][6]} Lourdes 07:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promo article with weak sourcing. The sources listed above by lourdes, are either WP:PRIMARY interview type coverage or are WP:ROUTINE news article about the unsubstantiated claims of discovery from the subject. --DBigXrayᗙ 07:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.