Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Im Sa-hong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MelanieN (talk) 01:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Im Sa-hong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The current version didn't show his notability...fails WP:GNG. He may be a court minister at the Joseon Royal Court, but source not given. If sources are available, I'll happy to withdrew. VocalIndia (talk) 07:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. VocalIndia (talk) 07:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. VocalIndia (talk) 07:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. VocalIndia (talk) 07:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. VocalIndia (talk) 07:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now: [1] Korean Wikipedia seems to have quite a few sources on this subject. Most are offline so that makes transferring content tricky, but the ones that are online seem easily transferable and referenceable. Still, many paragraphs in the Korean version are unsourced, so that doesn't exude complete confidence. Curbon7 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. VocalIndia (talk) 03:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to be significant enough for an article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the article is under-sourced but I dispute that it fails to show his notability - someone who is coming up that often in historical dramas is obviously a well-known historical figure in Korea. I don't read Korean so I can't add anything to this article myself, but I'm confident the sources exist. -- asilvering (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CLOSING NOTE: The title initially listed here, Im Sahong, is actually a redirect. The discussion is clearly intended to apply to the main article, Im Sa-hong, and I have changed the title of this AfD to reflect that. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.