Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Image Production House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:46, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image Production House

Image Production House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Google News pulls up nothing. A general Google search result pulls up WP:USERG sites. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete Looking through the article's history, there was never a point where it had any acceptable sources. Unsourced content needs to be removed, regardless of notability, and the entire page is unsourced. CorporateM (Talk) 19:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Image Production House, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.