Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagistic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 07:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Imagistic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written only for promotional and advertising purposes. References are very poor. No significant coverage by independent media. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 13:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete one RS is still present, the other (Bloomberg) is a 404, everything else is primary or press release. Where are you finding all these terrible company articles ... - David Gerard (talk) 15:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete by all means as the worst part is the 2nd sentence, going to specifics about the company, something that only the company would say and the company alone, nothing else is immune from PR because it involved PR, from its business activities to its PR awards, none of that was independent from said company itself. SwisterTwister talk 19:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:PROMO. With a section on "Awards/Contributions", this is strictly "corporate spam". The company shows no indications of notability or significance per available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.