Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ImpactFlow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that NORG is not satisfied Nosebagbear (talk) 23:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ImpactFlow

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined. There are certainly mentions of this crowdsouring platform, but nothing that suggests to me that it meets WP:GNG or WP:NORG. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing anything to suggest that it's anymore notable than the other crowd sourcing platforms out there. Whispering^(t) 23:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG or WP:NORG another crowd sourcing platform not clear how it is notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.