Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran Uddin (Blogger)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:44, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Uddin (Blogger)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sources in article are not reliable (blogs and a youtube video... other sources are 404 or from the site he founded) and there is not

significant coverage. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 16:39, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.247.102 (talk) 04:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- not a notable blogger.
Delete per nomination, as subject lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party sources. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Attempt at a souped-up resume at best, very little in the form of coverage by reliable sources out there. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 18:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 18:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 18:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO. just yet another blogger. ukexpat (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable blogger, fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:14, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Some sources, one from a news channel in India, but not enough for WP:GNG. Even if notable, the article also needs a rewrite (seriously, "he started developing some unique skills like... hacking?") Esquivalience ^t 20:53, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO. SmackoVector (talk) 03:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete This article should not be deleted because it looks like NPOV and notable according to WP:GNG and It is representing fairly, proportionately and without bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. All third party sources are reliable and genuine from high authority blogger sites and news channel in India.Salamuddin (talk) 12:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)— Shaikh Salamuddin (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Do Not Delete This article is very inspirational. We all know about his great things that are done in the young age. Every youngster is proud about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prasanthbalanagu (talk • contribs) 06:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC) — Prasanthbalanagu (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Do Not Delete According to me, This page should not be removed because it is neutral point of view and sources of the page also looks genuine such as V6 News, JustWebWorld, Medust Blog etc.Paula Edwards (talk) 15:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC) — PaulaEdwards (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete - The subject fails the general notability guidelines and the person seems to be non-notable blogger from Republic of India. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 12:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete Please do not delete this page. He have already achieved a lot in younger age which will inspire to others. Wiki User 8:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.241.117.171 (talk) — 43.241.117.171 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 43.241.117.171 (UTC).
Delete No notability demonstrated whatsoever. The sock/meatpuppetry evident here is also telling. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:43, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This looks like an open and shut case. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.