Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InCharge Energy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

InCharge Energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks sufficient coverage from independent, reliable sources Hopkinkse (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hopkinkse (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Canada, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:59, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete- per above ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Does not have valid secondary sourcing WP:SIGCOV to prove notability. The sources are a PR press release and the company websites. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 21:17, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Only found one source meeting WP:ORGCRIT. Could also redirect to ABB as an WP:ATD based on this. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per above, no WP:SIGCOV. --hroest 19:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.