Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inanimate Objects Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inanimate Objects Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ORGCRITE, coverage in secondary sources appears limited to a brief mention in an academic paper about discourse at RPI, student publications and possibly some coverage in a local paper that is now a dead link. Even if that article is substantial, I don't think we make the cut. Previously this was converted to a redirect a few times, but given that there is apparently no mention at the target, deletion seems preferable. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New York. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination (and as one of the earlier redirectors). CapitalSasha ~ talk 02:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nowhere near meeting WP:SIGCOV. AusLondonder (talk) 17:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.