Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inclusive thinking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW). NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusive thinking

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced essay/OR Jac16888 ^Talk 22:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; recreation of an article deleted last month. Blackguard 00:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the same reasons I tagged it earlier - it's an OR essay with no inline cites. —Swpb^talk 13:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources are from Wikimedia, and it's an original essay, meaning it fails WP:NOTESSAY. Imitch5 (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 15:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Creative thinking, also called inclusive thinking, does exist, and thousands of sources could be found. But this is not it. Please, put it out of its misery and delete it. Bearian (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -per WP:NOR. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.