Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndieBio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IndieBio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on a non-notable company. Coverage largely is of the startups, not of IndieBio itself. There also has been some whitewashing going on, with parts of the company's history (particularly getting founded by an Irish organization) being suppressed in order to more strongly promote others (particularly the person now named the sole founder). COI editing through and through. Huon (talk) 16:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom, total spam, fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing⁺⁺12:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no comment on notability (I have an acquaintance who worked at a startup funded by this group), but the current article is blatantly promotional. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.