Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinity Q

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

I'm closing this as a Soft Delete due to the confusion in the deletion rationale and the mispplication of WP:BLP1E guidelines which apply to BLPs. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infinity Q

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable except for one event WP:BLP1E ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Owen× ☎ 21:36, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:BLP1E, notable only for one event. — Maile (talk) 23:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment / Question - I used to be fairly involved in deletion discussions but it has been several years. Why is BLP1E relevant here? Beach drifter (talk) 23:37, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Velissaris is the BLP1E subject here. We can delete that entire section too and solely argue on basis of lack of SIGCOV too ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just looking at WP:ILLCON, as I do not see any sources that cover anything other than the crime. Beach drifter (talk) 23:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Section can likely be removed per WP:COAT but agree with others that BLP1E would not apply to a company page. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. I'm afraid that BLP1E doesn't apply. Infinity Q was an enterprise. It isn't and hasn't ever been a living person.—S Marshall T/C 23:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think that the coverage is trivial WP:ORGTRIV. I get where the WP:BLP1E confusion came from since it appears that one person from the company was sent to jail for fraud but the way it's phrased in the headlines kind of blurs the two. It at least mixed me up for a second. Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.