Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Professionals Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information Professionals Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of notability under GNG or SNG. There is absolutely zero coverage or even mention of them in the references except by themselves. Of the references, 3 are their own website, one is their linked in page and the remaining reference does not cover or even mention them. In a search I could not find any independent sources. Tagged for wp:notability by others since November. North8000 (talk) 18:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Created by a one purpose COI account. Their userpage explains it all. The subject of the article lacks notability, and only lists primary sources, including from LinkedIn. Cursory google search doesn't come up with suitable results. X (talk) 19:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete advert with no independent coverage. - Altenmann >talk 22:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per all the above, a promotional page for an organisation with no evidence of notability, nor even any attempt to demonstrate notability. AusLondonder (talk) 23:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per all that is already cited above. Promotional. TLA^tlak 08:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.