Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Technology Channel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 01:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information Technology Channel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Survived AfD in 2005 but still unsourced. Mccapra (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find anything to support notability. I'm sure what they do is important and useful, but not notable. Schazjmd (talk) 21:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing to support WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. The reasons given in the previous AfD do not really apply in the current standards. Even their website linked in the article now redirects to TV Box. — MarkH21 (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.