Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information technology and ethics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information technology and ethics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, probably can't be fixed without WP:TNT. If I didn't know better, I'd say this was another "Wiki in the classroom" kind of project.MSJapan (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GSS (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. With its introductory material and conclusion this is written as an essay/student paper rather than an encyclopedia article. While the title says IT ethics, the paper is a compilation of various topics which are already covered here in Computer ethics, Cybercrime, and Internet privacy. I don't see much here which could be added to those articles. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly fails WP:NOTESSAY, especially with text like "This [cybercrime] is the main topic that I will discuss in detail because it is also the main subject for my assignment project." AndrewWTaylor (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I endorsed Acroterion's PROD:Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought or academic research. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.