Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstaForex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

InstaForex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability NE Ent 09:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability, no evidence of anything really since there are no reliable sources. There are 2 reference to the financial regulatory authorities of Belize - which is not known for its financial markets. The first one says they are regulated, the second says that the license has been withdrawn (and is now a deadlink). There is no way we'd even be able to tell if it is still in business. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 12:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability, clearly created to promote the company. Furthermore we need to nuke these obviously commercial pages even when they do include include sources trying to claim marginal Notability. Alsee (talk) 21:30, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.