Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insurtech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Insurtech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO and WP:PROMO as well, see author's user page. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 07:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : No reliable sources provided, all from blogs & social media. Without them it appears borderline made-up (A11). Cabayi (talk) 07:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC) ... Had I seen RK's afd before adding and reverting my edit conflicted PROD (text above), I'd have been more assertive on the A11 & also added G11. Cabayi (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 11:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete highly questionable neologism - David Gerard (talk) 11:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- an unreferenced essay consisting potentially entirely of OR. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.